Deputy head of the Bundestag said that Germany risks becoming a “dysfunctional state”
According to Wolfgang Kubicki, Germany must address the infrastructure crisis, high energy prices, and the Bundeswehr’s inability to protect the country.
Many Germans believe that Germany is on the verge of becoming a dysfunctional state as a result of the German authorities’ inability to solve the accumulated problems. This was stated by the deputy chairman of the Free Democratic Party of Germany (FDP, Liberals), Vice-Chairman of the Bundestag Wolfgang Kubicki, in an interview with the newspaper Bild am Sonntag on Saturday.
“Many residents believe that Germany is on the verge of becoming dysfunctional. Infrastructure, energy prices, and the Bundeswehr’s inability to protect the country – we must address these issues now or things will get worse “He stated. “We were elected to improve the country’s and its citizens’ well-being, not to jeopardize it. Our economy must remain buoyant “Kubicki explained.
“If we continue to act in the same spirit, paying aid for years as part of the fight against the energy crisis, we may face state socialism, if not state bankruptcy,” he added. Kubicki pointed out that the €110 billion that Germany intends to spend solely on energy imports due to the current crisis will be lost in other areas. “We cannot stay in this financial crisis for long; otherwise, there will not be enough money for investment,” believes the deputy chairman of the Bundestag.
Kubicki criticized the “greens'” position on energy policy first and foremost. “We do not want or do not receive more gas or oil from Russia, while our “green” friends restart coal-fired power plants, preventing a reasonable extension of nuclear power plant operations,” he said. “I am outraged that we as a “traffic light” coalition are not able to use all of the opportunities to obtain sufficient and affordable amounts of energy in such difficult times for citizens and, above all, our economy,” Kubicki said. He recalled that the “greens” are opposed to the exploration of gas fields in the North Sea, despite an agreement reached during coalition talks last year
“We pay exorbitant prices for liquefied natural gas from Qatar, the UAE, and the United States while refusing to extract our more affordable shale gas for ideological reasons. That will not do! “The politician emphasized. “We need to get better at dealing with crises,” Kubicki believes.
courtesy : AZgeopolitics telegram channel
The Heart–Brain Connection
Most of us have been taught in school that the heart is constantly responding to “orders” sent by the brain in the form of neural signals. However, it is not as commonly known that the heart actually sends more signals to the brain than the brain sends to the heart! Moreover, these heart signals have a significant effect on brain function – influencing emotional processing as well as higher cognitive faculties such as attention, perception, memory, and problem-solving. In other words, not only does the heart respond to the brain, but the brain continuously responds to the heart.
The effect of heart activity on brain function has been researched extensively over about the past 40 years. Earlier research mainly examined the effects of heart activity occurring on a very short time scale – over several consecutive heartbeats at maximum. Scientists at the HeartMath Institute have extended this body of scientific research by looking at how larger-scale patterns of heart activity affect the brain’s functioning.
HeartMath Institute research has demonstrated that different patterns of heart activity (which accompany different emotional states) have distinct effects on cognitive and emotional function. During stress and negative emotions, when the heart rhythm pattern is erratic and disordered, the corresponding pattern of neural signals traveling from the heart to the brain inhibits higher cognitive functions. This limits our ability to think clearly, remember, learn, reason, and make effective decisions. (This helps explain why we may often act impulsively and unwisely when we’re under stress.) The heart’s input to the brain during stressful or negative emotions also has a profound effect on the brain’s emotional processes—actually serving to reinforce the emotional experience of stress.
In contrast, the more ordered and stable pattern of the heart’s input to the brain during positive emotional states has the opposite effect – it facilitates cognitive function and reinforces positive feelings and emotional stability. This means that learning to generate increased heart rhythm coherence, by sustaining positive emotions, not only benefits the entire body, but also profoundly affects how we perceive, think, feel, and perform.
More here >>> https://www.heartmath.com/science/
Hamzah Zainudin (PN-Larut) yang juga ketua pembangkang membuka tirai perbahasan usul berkenaan.
Ahli Parlimen lain yang turut berbahas adalah Lim Guan Eng (PH-Bagan), Takiyuddin Hassan (PN-Kota Bharu), Ronald Kiandee (PN-Beluran), Johari Ghani (BN-Titiwangsa), Fadhli Shaari (PN-Pasir Mas), Rafizi Ramli (PH-Pandan), Wan Saiful Wan Jan (PN-Tasek Gelugor), Jeffrey Kitingan (GRS-Keningau), Shahidan Kassim (PN-Arau), Dzulkefly Ahmad (PH-Kuala Selangor), dan Bung Moktar Radin (BN-Kinabatangan).
Berdasarkan sokongan mengikut parti, jumlah Ahli Parlimen yang menyokong kerajaan perpaduan pimpinan Anwar sekarang ialah seramai 148 orang.
Ia merangkumi daripada PH 82, BN 30, GPS 23, GRS 6, Warisan 3, KDM 2, PBM 1, dan Bebas 1 kerusi.
Selebihnya iaitu 74 kerusi ialah milik PN yang merupakan blok pembangkang.
Courtesy : FMT
“Democratic countries don’t invade their neighbors. Democratic countries don’t harbor terrorists. Democratic countries don’t use weapons of mass destruction.” — Former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Jon Stewart, November 2022
15 Dis 2022
An Opinion by Mediterranean Man - A Telegram Schizo Telegram channel @MediterraneanMan
You're all aware of labels and phrases like Globalism, "the world is a small village.", Interconnected, and some satanic organizations like the World Economic Forum, but a subscriber here asked, what really is globalism about? And is there anything redeemable about it?
Globalism refers to something that is, well, global in nature, don't mistake it with the old colonial times of the 19th and 18th century, the term itself only popped into existence after the second world war, before that, usually it was local authorities who were subservient to a higher one (Emirate to a caliphate, or a colony to the homeland), or national and imperial entities asserting their policies and the will of their kings and queen, but globalism after WW2 refers to the post war world that came to be, it was Communism versus Capitalism on the world stage, and Washington and Moscow wanted to plan out how they will win the cold war, and so they were planning global policies based on this, especially the Americans, who wanted a global world that is centric to their views, I don't know if you know that, but at 1948, the US had 50% of the worlds wealth, while only around 5% of the worlds population, so they obviously wanted to stay at the top, no matter what.
Globalism back then just meant an integrated global economic system, and from money it went from trying to integrate the world's economy into the world's politics, and international institutes, and eventually, perhaps, a world government.
Now, I told you what Globalism is, how it began, and how it evolved, now what is it good for?
Globalism as an ideology and aims is detestable, but it's methods and tools are actually quite good if played by the right nations.
Pros : 1) a single economic union that ensures prosperity and welfare of the state's resources and of it's citizens -> you're looking at unions like BRICS, SCO, GCC, and Eurasian Economic Union where national authority is respected but trade and policies are simplified.
2) Exchange of cultures, now notice I said exchange, not replace, I admire some aspects of Russian culture from my personal interactions, and likewise, some Russians I personally know are also impressed by the insights and societal values we have, we don't have to agree on everything, just take what's useful and get along.
3) without globalism, I think people will be limited to the view their nation limits, which to me is slightly wrong, a Christian may want to spread his message, and a Muslim will want to do the same, some nations have historically missed extremely important developments in human history because they were too isolated.
4) also without globalism, none of us would be here, the subscribers of this channel are made up of Serbs, Germans, Russians, Arabs, Brazilians, Indonesians, and Americans, all united in a common idea and having friendly interactions.
So, what are the cons?
If not mentioned in the 4 aspects, it's a con, everything else is just a filthy Jewish trick that wants to eradicate culture, religion, and morals and values.\
