WELCOME :: MAIN MENU MOVED TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS BLOG

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Nation dragged into immoral politics


* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the writer.

FEB 15,2010  — Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is facing one of the most daunting periods of his political career.

If the court finds that the A-G Chambers is able to prove beyond reasonable doubt and convict Anwar, it will most probably spell the end of a tumultuous career of an enigmatic leader.

For the uninitiated, this “Sodomy Redux” of Anwar’s alleged indescretion bears a similar plot, from the main players right up to the actual charge itself.

The story goes of how Anwar, a 62-year-old father of six with a history of back problems who forced himself on his former aide Saiful Bukhari Azlan, a young and fit mid-20s university dropout.

The storyline is bizzare to say the least that would even make Hugh Hefner, founder of the biggest pornographic empire Playboy, smirk in disgust.

While we are being fed with juicy details of the supposedly homosexual tendencies of Anwar, it is nauseating to see how the media is bent on tarnishing and assasinate the character of the person representing the biggest threat to Umno and almost single handedly dented Umno’s 50-odd years of hegemony.

Umno pulled out from the book every single dirty trick that it knows to add to the sodomy charge in their desperate attempt to hold on to power by abusing the media, institutions and enforcement agencies in their attempt to hoodwink the people.

With both Anwar and the government jostling to win over the public — one claiming political motives on the charges and the other trying to display Anwar as a sodomist — the mainstream media is siding with the government and the new media tilting towards Anwar.

The irresponsibility of the mainstream media is marked by the glorifying of Saiful that only serve to galvanise public opinion against the claim that he was victimised by Anwar.

Malay-language daily Utusan Malaysia, regarded as the mouthpiece of Umno, led the attack against Anwar and sensationally attempting to paint the picture of a monster with unnatural tendencies.

Just like in the previous sodomy charge on Anwar, the current scenario has the court of public opinion siding with Anwar and a strong perception of mala fide on the side of the government.

The prosecution’s attempt to "shock and awe" the defence and the people of Malaysia by putting its star witness as the first on the stand revealed its intention to close its case as soon as possible.

If the judge finds that there is a prima facie case for Anwar to answer, we can expect the defence to launch counter-attacks raising questions from political motives, credibility of witness, authenticity of semen or DNA stain found and key players involved prior to and after the alleged act, etc.

The balance of the case tilts on the question of whether penetration is a key element in the act of sodomy and the court’s decision on Feb 17 will determine the course of the trial.

On the other hand, the prosecution is bent on adducing forensic evidence that there is semen found in the anus of Saiful and that penetration is not key to an act of sodomy; which makes the case sound even more ridiculous than it already is.

If the court finds in the favour of the prosecution, we can expect a long and protracted case that will fill the front pages of the local media for quite some time.

After the massive public relations failure of the first sodomy charge on Anwar in 1998, the powers-that-be now prefer a quick resolution rather than a drawn-out case that will not kill of Anwar politically, but may turn the tide against them in the run-up to the next general election.

Malaysians cannot help but feel that the charge is preferred against Anwar due to political motives more than anything else due to the endless questions and doubts raised about the case including the conduct of the preceeding investigations.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s Umno is the direct beneficiary by the persecution of Anwar, and Anwar himself has accused Najib of playing a role in this case.

With Anwar being kept busy in the corridors of Kuala Lumpur’s Jalan Duta Court Complex, Umno on the other hand is roaming, plotting and scheming to disrupt and destroy Pakatan Rakyat.

Umno is fast establishing itself as a hardcore right-wing radical Malay party with its endless animosity against the Selangor and Penang state governments, accusing them of being un-Islamic and anti-Malay.

Beginning from the “Allah” row, where Umno took a very conservative position, it followed that up with attacking Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, the Selangor Mentri Besar, over the state’s decision to confiscate the land belonging to Yayasan Basmi Kemiskinan (YBK), painted as a pro-Malay institution for not paying up quit rent amounting to more than RM5 million.

Protests and demonstrations have also been loud in Penang with Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng at the centre of the attack.

Utusan Malaysia, displaying pure unethical journalism, lied through its teeth when it reported that the Penang state government cancelled the state-level Maulidur Rasul (Prophet Muhammad’s Birthday) procession which was immediately denied by Lim.

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and Former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi waded into the controversy by criticising the Penang government on an unsubstantiated report that had no basis whatsoever.

Not letting up on Anwar & Co, Umno followed that through with concerted and subversive moves to accentuate discord among problematic leaders within Pakatan especially within Anwar’s own party PKR.

With Anwar distracted in the confines of the court, Umno instigated those mercenaries to quit PKR exemplified by the departure of Datuk Seri Zahrain Hashim, the former PKR Penang chief, which is intended to further put Anwar on the backfoot.

Umno conjured the move to tarnish Anwar, backing that up with mindless polarising moves using the race and religion card to distance the Malays from Anwar.

While Umno is deep in its slumber in the caves of orthodoxy, Malaysians are getting more urbanised, embracing universal values of justice, openness and cosmopolitanism.

Malaysians who are used to be subservient to the government are now taking a pivotal role in the decision-making process of the nation.

While Anwar is being dragged by pro-Umno conspirators into the lairs of Sungai Buloh Prison, questions over the independence of the judiciary, impartiality of A-G Chambers and the abuse of institutions for the benefit of the ruling cliques hover in the minds of many Malaysians.

The incarceration of Anwar represents everything that is rotten in the country — sense of justice, equality and humanity — which is lost among those in Putrajaya making the decisions that affect the daily lives of ordinary Malaysians.

This is not the trial of Anwar and Anwar alone, every single Malaysian is on trial whether we demand for justice, whether we want equality and if we are humane enough and care for a fellow Malaysian as though he or she is a family member.

While Umno attempts to pull Malaysians apart using old-school dogmatic politics, we are left with no choice but to reject divisiveness and demand for reform.

The demand for justice for the slained Teoh Beng Hock and S. Kugan must be accorded to Anwar as he is a respectable human being and, more importantly, he is a fellow Malaysian.

Umno does not realise that it is digging its own grave and Malaysians will read it its final rites in the next general election.

Malaysians will resist Umno’s attempt to drag them into the doldrums of mediocrity and immorality.


Wednesday, February 17, 2010

War Mongering at US-Islamic Forum in Doha, Qatar.

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has begun a three-day visit to the Gulf for talks aimed at gathering Arab support for countering Iran’s disputed nuclear programme and reviving the Arab-Israeli peace process... more

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has warned that the US sees Iran's nuclear programme as the main threat in the region.

She made her comments at the US-Islamic World Forum in Qatar, a conference jointly organised by the Qatari foreign ministry and the US-based Brookings Institution and intended to promote dialogue on improving US-Islamic relations.

Al Jazeera's Clayton Swisher has this report.





Monday, February 15, 2010

President Names Special Envoy to Islamic Conference (OIC)


Rashad Hussain will expand partnerships with Muslims around the world

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
February 13, 2010

PRESIDENT OBAMA ANNOUNCES SPECIAL ENVOY TO THE ORGANIZATION OF THE ISLAMIC CONFERENCE

WASHINGTON - Today, President Obama appointed Rashad Hussain to serve as his Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). Comprised of over 50 member states, the OIC is the second largest inter-governmental organization in the world. As Special Envoy to the OIC, Rashad Hussain will deepen and expand the partnerships that the United States has pursued with Muslims around the world since President Obama’s speech in Cairo last June.

President Obama said, “I’m proud to announce today that I am appointing my Special Envoy to the OIC—Rashad Hussain. As an accomplished lawyer and a close and trusted member of my White House staff, Rashad has played a key role in developing the partnerships I called for in Cairo. And as a hafiz of the Qur’an, he is a respected member of the American Muslim community, and I thank him for carrying forward this important work.” 

Rashad Hussain

Rashad Hussain is presently Deputy Associate Counsel to President Obama. His work at the White House focuses on national security, new media, and science and technology issues.  Mr. Hussain has also worked with the National Security Staff in pursuing the New Beginning that President Obama outlined in his June 2009 address in Cairo, Egypt. Mr. Hussain previously served as a Trial Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice. Earlier in his career, Mr. Hussain was a legislative assistant on the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, where he focused on national security-related issues. Mr. Hussain received his J.D. from Yale Law School, where he served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. Upon graduation, he served as a Law Clerk to Damon J. Keith on the U.S. Court of Appeals. Mr. Hussain also earned Master’s degrees in Public Administration and Arabic and Islamic Studies from Harvard University. He completed his undergraduate education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

US-Islamic World Forum begins today


13 February 2010 | DOHA: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will join Qatar's Prime Minister H E Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem bin Jabor Al Thani to address the seventh edition of US-Islamic World Forum opening here today.

The three-day event, being jointly hosted by the US think- tank Brookings Institution and Qatar's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has brought together leading experts and policy makers of both the US and the Islamic world including Chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee John Kerry, US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke and the US Special Representative to Muslim Communities Farah Pandith, said Mohammed Abdullah Al Rumaihi, Assistant to the Foreign Minister to Follow-Up Affairs.

The theme of the 2010 conference would be the new American president's approach to the Muslim World exemplified in his much-debated Cairo Speech.

The new American president has endeavoured to set a new and positive tone for engagement, exemplified by his historic remarks in Cairo. We will explore how much the discourse has been translated into substantive policy recommendations and programmes, Strobe Talbott, president, The Brookings Institution, said here yesterday.

To what extend Obama succeeded in his mission will be debated at the forum. Brooking's Saban Center for Middle East Policy perceives the Cairo speech as the idea of partnership with the US and Islamic World, specifically around the idea of partnership for tangible results.

President Obama's video message will be screened at the opening session.

This year's Forum called "Writing the Next Chapter", will focus on the new opportunities created by the changing global political and economic landscape and the promise of President Obama's pledge to build new bridges with the Muslim world. The working sessions will discuss how to build on the Obama administration's "fresh start" with Muslim communities around the globe, the potential for strengthening private and public sector partnerships. The highlight of the three-day event would be the six special working groups which would be closed to the media.

Replying to a query, Al Rumaihi said Clinton will hold a series of meeting on the sidelines of the Forum.


Saturday, February 13, 2010

Washington DC gets Yr Tiger holiday?


A $US20 cab ride to the airport skyrocketed to the "snow rate" of $US100 in the nation's capital, and those travellers who could get to the airport or train station still had to haggle or wait in long lines to escape the snowbound region.

The most pressing matter - get out before more of the white stuff comes on Tuesday... more


Schools closed, public transporation barely moved and the U.S. federal government shut down for a fourth straight day. VOA's Laurel Bowman has more on how winter is playing havoc with Washington.











WILL IT TRIGGER A RETHINK ON CLIMATE CHANGE?


Others Malaysian voted chairman of IAEA Board of Governors



Malaysian envoy, Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob

Sat, 13 Feb 2010  |  PressTV

The Malaysian ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob, has been elected as the new chairman of the body's 35-member Board of Governors.


Yaakob was elected after his fellow countryman, Mohd Arshad bin Manzoor Hussain — who had originally been voted to chair the board in the current period but was eventually recalled by Kuala Lumpur in December 2009.


Over the past few months, reports have been circulating that Arshad had been in fact sacked for supporting Iran's nuclear program in an IAEA vote.


The allegations, however, have been dismissed out of hand by the Malaysian Foreign Ministry.


"The ambassador's term is up in March and so it will not be renewed and we are hoping to replace him with another Malaysian envoy," AFP quoted the country's Foreign Minister Anifah Aman as saying on Saturday.


"Mohammad Arshad's contract was extended upon his retirement and that extension is ending in March so he should bow out gracefully to let younger diplomats have a chance to serve the country in international organizations," he added.


The Board of Governors is one of the two policy making bodies of the IAEA. The board consists of 13 members designated by the outgoing board and 22 members elected by the General Conference — which is the highest policymaking body of the IAEA.


The chairmanship of the IAEA Board of Governors routinely rotates between different geographical regions. 

Drop Anwar charges, Australian MPs tell Malaysia.


Friday, 12 February 2010 | (The Australian) - MORE than 50 Australian members of parliament, including frontbenchers from both sides of politics, have signed a letter demanding that the Malaysian judiciary drop charges of sodomy against former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim.

Michael Danby, chairman of parliament's foreign affairs subcommittee, delivered the letter to the Malaysian high commissioner, Salman Bin Ahmad, yesterday.

The letter says: "It should be made known to the Malaysian government that in our opinion global esteem for Malaysia will be affected by these charges against Mr Anwar."

The letter further states: "Many friendly observers of Malaysia find it difficult to believe that a leading opposition voice could be charged with sodomy a second time, and so soon after his party made major gains in national elections."

Most of the 50 signatories are Labor members, including two frontbenchers, parliamentary secretaries Gary Gray and Laurie Ferguson. The Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Anna Burke, also signed the letter.

On the Liberal side, environment spokesman Greg Hunt is the most senior signatory, along with former opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull.

Mr Anwar was first charged with sodomy in 1998. He was convicted, but in 2004 Malaysia's Federal Court overturned his conviction.

Mr Anwar was a former deputy prime minister and finance minister under Malaysia's long-serving former leader, Mahathir Mohammed. The two fell out bitterly in the wake of the 1998 Asian financial crisis. Since he was released from jail, Mr Anwar has become the leader of the Malaysian opposition, which made sweeping gains in Malaysia's last federal and state elections.

Such a strong pro-Anwar intervention by so many, and such senior, Australian politicians could well once more inflame the Australia-Malaysia relationship, which went through turbulent times when Dr Mahathir and Paul Keating were their countries's respective leaders. Since then Australia has trodden softly to ensure Malaysian co-operation on trade, military and intelligence, counter-terrorism and regional efforts to stop people-smuggling. 


Friday, February 12, 2010

KeAdilan kesal dengan pemecatan Duta Malaysia ke PBB oleh Kerajaan BN.


KENYATAAN MEDIA  |  UNTUK EDARAN SEGERA

Tarikh: 11 Februari 2010

KEADILAN KESAL DENGAN PEMECATAN DUTA MALAYSIA KE PBB OLEH KERAJAAN BN

Penyingkiran diplomat veteran Duta Mohd Arshad Manzoor Hussain kerana beliau mengundi bersama-sama Cuba dan Venezuela merupakan peristiwa yang cukup malang. Beliau telah melalui suatu kerjaya khidmat yang panjang dan terkenal dengan ketokohannya.Secara peribadi, beliau mempertahankan tindakannya mengundi itu seiring dengan prinsip-prinsip yang diangkat dalam Gerakan Negara-negara Berkecuali, yang mana selama ini Malaysia merupakan anggotanya yang cukup bersungguh-sungguh sekali iltizamnya.

Pemecatan ini belum pernah lagi terjadi. Ia menghantar isyarat kepada dunia bahawa kerajaan Malaysia telah menjual kemerdekaan diplomatik rakyatnya. PKR menggesa PM Najib Razak untuk mengisytiharkan pendirian kepada umum, samada Malaysia telah membuang prinsip negara berkecuali dan menyerahkan kedaulatan negara kepada kehendak serta keinginan kuasa besar dunia.

LATHEEFA KOYA
Ketua Penerangan
Parti Keadilan Rakyat

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Former US President Bill Clinton hospitalized.

Former US President Bill clinton has been taken to hospital in New York suffering from chest pains.


Petro Ringgit and UMNO politics


Thursday, 11 February 2010  -  A few weeks ago, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah has spoken about the oil royalty issue for Kelantan. He is saying that Kelantan is entitled to a 5 % royalty on oil and gas revenues off the Kelantan coast. He spoke to a large crowd of some 40,000 people in a stadium in Kota Bharu. The talk ruffled a lot of feathers. 


He is seen to have broken ranks with his UMNO brethren. The business-as-usual approach of UMNO people is to keep any fortuitous advantage as a tactical advantage. The fact that it has control over a very important economic asset, oil, is one such fortuitous advantage. Control over the petrol money allows UMNO and the federal government to dictate political outcomes on its terms. 

But will this kind of control last long and win adherents to UMNO? 

What Tengku Razaleigh has done is to expose a secret weapon that UMNO has. That has earned him the wrath of UMNO people. Some UMNO people are even calling for his expulsion. The UMNO president is more circumspect preferring to study the matter first. 

The gulf that divides the thinking of TRH and the majority of UMNO people is much more significant than a difference over giving up of tactical advantage. It involves the correct reading of public sentiments that could yield long term political advantage and determine the longevity of UMNO itself. 

What motivates the present generation and what did the previous generation are different. I have touched about this in a previous article. The 1st generation of leaders and followers were motivated primarily by a desire to get rid of colonialism. Leaders emerged naturally because there were external stimuli that moved people. After independence, that kind of stimulus isn't there anymore. Leaders and conscious followers didn't emerge naturally. 

They are now moved by different urges. 

What are these? Chief among these are the universal values of rule of law, efficient government, good governance, animosity against corruption and all these. These are the elements, when articulated and struggled for, win adherents and loyalty and respect.

So, between a Tengku Razaleigh who articulates these elements and the rest who speak about aged old urges, which one will earn adherents? UMNO must choose its issues carefully now. 

TRH speaks about a subject on which he has direct knowledge. He is arguably among the few together with Tun Razak who has full knowledge on what took place in the early years of PETRONAS. 

How will UMNO treat him? I say gingerly. UMNO will be foolish to discount him totally. Doing that would injure UMNO's credibility further. He represents the saner voice of reason within UMNO. He speaks on issues that could earn adherents to a rejuvenated UMNO. 
Set the record straight

Along that line, what UMNO needs to do immediately is to carry out a project with immediate social and political impact. One of them, in my mind, is dealing unequivocally with this oil royalty issue. It has no other choice but to set the record straight. If Kelantan is entitled to a 5% oil royalty, then it must be given that. No beating around the bush- no ehsan money or other political tongue twisters. 

When PM Najib announced that he isn't interested in staying for the sake of just staying as PM, that statement strongly indicates his intention to make a difference. The difference being he is more interested in seeing results and performance. The difference being PM Najib is more interested to achieve those issues articulated by TRH. Let's help him along by giving him sound advice. 

The fact is Kelantan is entitled to receive a portion of the oil revenue. This entitlement is clearly provided for in the vesting deed signed by the PETRONAS Chairman then (TRH himself) and the Chief Minister then. The same document also applies to other states in Malaysia where oil is found off their shores. 

The wish of the late Tun Razak

It was the wish of the late Tun Razak, our prime minister then, to see revenues from oil, applied on the poorer states. That was sound economics- the richer states carry the poorer ones. It's the strategy currently applied by China's SOEs; the richer ones carrying the poorer ones. 

Oil is a national resource. It is inconceivable for a national resource to be enjoyed by only the states closest in proximity to that resource. If that is the case, it's no longer a national resource but state owned. It should then be treated as land which is under the full discretion of the state. Clearly this wasn't the idea of a national resource. 

Turning it into a national resource was a wise move. Tun Razak even refused to name PETRONAS with the name The Malay Petroleum Company. Oil is to be the resource of One Malaysia, for Malaysians. 

By treating it as a national resource whose revenue is shareable by all, the act of sharing neutralizes the accidents of geography. Those states whose offshore do not have oil can still enjoy some benefits from oil revenue. That is the real ehsan money. It wasn't contingent upon seasonal inclinations of government. 

I think, the idea behind oil revenue, is that it must be applied for the benefit of all states independent of political expediencies. If this government refuses to apply the idea of ehsan money, it opens itself to charges of favoritism and politicking. 

the PDA

The idea behind the PDA should be that a federal government collects the revenues and apply them nationally. It's not even up to PETRONAS to see to it that it's done. Their duty as regards royalties is to pass on a sum of monies to the federal government which in turn dispenses the money to the states concern. To the state with oil and gas, a 5% share in the revenues, to those without oil, some portion of the oil revenue. 

In so far as a state that is proximate to the source of oil, my understanding is that it is entitled to a 5 % royalty per year. Hence Terengganu, from which oil and gas are tapped, is entitled to 5%. If Kelantan qualifies as being proximate to the source, it is also entitled to oil royalties. Each particular state where oil is found thus is entitled to 5% of the oil revenues. 

That still leaves 95% available to be applied for national purposes. This balance 95% from that particular source can be applied to states where no oil is found. The amount allocated to them is at the discretion of the federal government but it is a discretion that cannot be withheld.

Now whether that amount or any amount from the balance of which any state is entitled too has been applied appropriately, is another matter. States with no oil cannot expect to receive 5% oil royalties because they don't have oil and gas. For instance, in the case Pahang, it too can expect to have some contribution from this national resource. Pahang can also ask wang ehsan because it is in the bottom 4 states in Malaysia. 
Kelantan actually deserves two components

It seems to me, that Kelantan actually deserves two components of the oil revenues. Because it is close to where oil is extracted, it is entitled to 5% of the revenues collected from that oil source. As a poor state, within that classification envisaged by Tun Razak, it is entitled to a gratuitous amount to be determined by the federal government. This is the wang ehsan as defined by the government. It is distinct from oil royalties.

Hence if Kelantan is given wang ehsan of 20 million a year, it is still entitled to a 5% royalty on the oil that has been discovered off its coast. The first because it is comparatively a poor state. Second, because the oil fields are off its coast. 
The stupidity in Terengganu

But how does our government handle this situation? It has done stupidly in this area. The oil royalties accrueable to Terengganu for example should be under Terengganu's absolute control. Applied as the state pleases. It's not for the Federal government to judge how the oil royalties are applied. Instead, the government imposes its will through the creation of some administrative device that resulted in the monies being controlled by those people close to Pak Lah.

As a result of that kind of arrangements, we saw some people constructing holiday homes. Mosques sprouted everywhere etc. You can't travel past a kilometer without coming to a new mosque in Terengganu. Yet the people of Terengganu are still poor. Look out from the windows of The Grand Continental Hotel in KT; you will know what I mean. Cast your eyes in turn to the other side, the Heritage Hotel and the homes built so that Jean Toddt and Miss Michelle Yeoh can set up home. 
Correct that stupidity

This government of Dato Sri Najib can correct that stupidity. Return the right to control the oil royalties to the Terengganu government. If the Terengganu government abuses the new found wealth, let the 'market forces' in terms of people's voting power does its suitable job. 

Unfortunately it is set to repeat this stupidity in the case of Kelantan. The government stand is that, Kelantan is entitled to no such thing. They are willing to give a paltry sum of goodwill money of RM 20 million a year to Kelantan. Further the money will be distributed through federal agencies to carry out development in Kelantan.

You are going to repeat the same stupidity by creating artificial devices to channel petrol money. Just as when Pak Lah has his Patrick Lim and gang, this time around if PM Najib countenances the funneling of ehsan money through institutions other than state bodies, PM Najib is committing the same mistake as did Pak Lah. As with any funnel, the entry point is bigger than the exit point. 
The people pushing : UMNO warlords

The people pushing for the funneling or petrol monies in this manner are the UMNO warlords. The behavior of the UMNO warlords is also full of hypocrisy. They are always motivated by the underlying interest of what's in for me? Their insistence on this method is dubious. 

Oil royalties going direct to state government means UMNO warlords in Kelantan are marginalized. They have nothing to operate by. Wang ehsan going to federal development agencies offer warlords room to interfere and influence the direction and application of the funds. These agencies will be fertile ground to expand personal political agendas. With the majority of UMNO people, playing politics to retain and consolidate interests is the number one priority. 

Our leaders must do the right thing. 

The petrol money, either royalties or wang ehsan should be committed to institutions of the government of the day. Too bad, in Kelantan, the state is ruled by our political adversary. But doing the right thing, affirms our commitment to the rule of law and our belief that governments change though the ballot box. We don't form a government within a legitimate government. 


Monday, February 8, 2010

Prison 650 - 'Lady Qaeda', - Another SetUp By The U.S. Government




After a series of outbursts resulted in her twice being kicked out of the courtroom in which she is on trial, a Pakistani woman accused of trying to kill American soldiers at a detention center in Afghanistan in 2008, finally took the stand Thursday and denied she ever fired a shot.

Aafia Siddiqui, born in Pakistan and seen in this undated combo photo, was described by FBI chief Robert Mueller as an al Qaeda operative and facilitator, who attended college MIT. She is on trial in New York accused of shooting a U.S. soldiers and FBI agensts at an Afghanistan police station in 2008.

(FBI/MMR, via Reuters)  "It's just ridiculous I never attempted murder, no way. It's a heavy word," Aafia Siddiqui, a devoutly Muslim, MIT-trained neuroscientist and mother of two told jurors in a Manhattan federal court.

The allegations for which Siddiqui, 37, is being tried are deadly serious, if convicted, she could be sentenced to life in prison, but the courtroom antics of the so-called "Lady al Qaeda" border on a farce. A petite woman who keeps all but her eyes hidden behind a white headscarf and veil, Siddiqui's own lawyers fought to keep her from testifying in her own defense claiming her "diminished capacity" would "turn the trial into a spectacle." 

Siddiqui is a PhD neuroscientist who attended MIT, she is originally from Pakistan. Her father, Muhammad Siddiqui, was a British trained doctor. A Pakistani PhD. Having 144 Honorary Degrees & Certificates, In Neurology, From Different Institutes Of The World. The Only Neurologist In The World That Have The Honorary Ph.d From Harvard University ,
Not Even A Single American Matches her Qualifications,








Thursday, February 4, 2010

Prisoner 650 wrongfully convicted?


February 04, 2010 | RussiaToday | Aafia Siddiqui, the Pakistani scientist found guilty of attempting to kill American servicemen by a US court, "disappeared" from Karachi in March 2003.

Her family says she was held at the US military's Bagram airbase in Afghanistan.

But her first husband says she spent five years on the run with her children, before being arrested in 2008 with her adopted son in Afghanistan.

Al Jazeera's David Chater reports on Siddiqui's "missing years" (Vid below : Aafia Siddiqui's "missing years" - how reliable is Aljazeera, has aljazeera turn into another US propaganda machine? )





Many of Aafia Siddiquis supporters are saying that she was framed and that the servicemen who saw the act, all had different vantage points, some didnt even see anything. Petra Bartosiewicz joins Kristine Frazao, she is a writer for The Nation living in Brooklyn, New York. She is writing a book on the Justice Departments terrorism trials since 9/11, she has covered the Aafia Siddiqui trial extensively.






Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Prisoner 650 found guilty!



Thursday, February 04, 2010  | Pakistan found guilty of US attack :

A US-educated Pakistani woman who was arrested in Afghanistan and accused of shooting at her US interrogators, has been found guilty of attempted murder by a court in the US.

Aafia Siddiqui was found guilty by a New York court on Wednesday after a 12-member jury reached a unanimous verdict, but said the crime was not premeditated.

Siddiqui showed no emotion as the jury pronounced its verdict – reached after two days of deliberations – but shouted out as the jury members were leaving the court.

"This is a verdict coming from Israel, not America. Your anger should be directed where it belongs. I can testify to this and I have proof," Siddiqui said.

Siddiqui faces up to life in prison when she is sentenced on May 6.

Her lawyers had tried to prove Siddiqui, who reported disturbing hallucinations involving her missing children, was insane. But a judge ruled her fit to stand trial.

Afghanistan shooting

Siddiqui, a neuroscientist who trained at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US, was arrested by Afghan police in July 2008 in the town of Ghazni.

She had already caught the eye of human rights groups as prior to her arrest she had been missing for five years.

At the time of her arrest she was allegedly carrying containers of chemicals and notes referring to mass-casualty attacks and New York landmarks, leading some in the US press to dub her "Lady Qaeda".

But Siddiqui was not charged in connection with those materials and the charges she was convicted of do not mention terrorism.

Instead, the charges against her centred on an incident the next day in the Afghan police compound, where US soldiers and FBI agents sought to question her.

Siddiqui grabbed a US warrant officer's rifle while she was detained for questioning in July 2008 in Afghanistan's Ghazni province and fired at the FBI agents and military personnel, who returned fire.

None of the US agents or personnel were injured but Siddiqui was shot in the incident.

"She saw her chance to kill Americans and she took it," Christopher LaVigne, the prosecutor, told jurors.

Appeal expected

But Linda Moreno, Siddiqui's defence lawyer, said during the trial that there was no evidence the rifle had ever been fired, since no bullets, shell casings or bullet debris were recovered and no bullet holes detected.

Moreno also said the testimony of the government's six eyewitnesses contradicted one another on Siddiqui's location in the 28sq m room, the number of bullets fired and who was present.

Siddiqui shouted that the verdict was "from Israel" as the jury was leaving court [AFP]
Tina Foster, a spokeswoman for the Siddiqui family and the executive director of the International Justice Network, told Al Jazeera that there were "a lot of unfair rulings made by the judge and I think we can expect to see an appeal".

"Aafia walked into that courtroom already labelled a terrorist by prosecutors, despite the fact that she was not on trial for any terrorism related offence," Foster said.

"I think that if there was credible evidence that Aafia Siddiqui had been involved in any sort of terrorist activities ... any sort of plot against the United States that she had been involved in, we would have seen prosecutions for those crimes," she said.

"One has to wonder whether the reasons she was in custody to begin with are ever going to be addressed by the government of the United States.

"Why she had been on that wanted list, and why all of these allegations that were not made in court have continued to be leaked to the media and have continued to paint Dr Aafia in a negative light despite the fact that she has never been charged with any terrorism activity."

Pakistan's embassy in Washington also voiced its criticism, saying it was "dismayed over the unexpected verdict".

"The government of Pakistan made intense diplomatic and legal efforts on her behalf and will consult the family of Dr Aafia Siddiqui and the team of defence lawyers to determine the future course of action," it said.


YouTube : A Pakistani female neuroscientist has been convicted of trying to kill US soldiers and FBI agents while she was being detained at a police station in Afghanistan.

Prosecutors accuse Aafia Siddiqui of firing at her interrogators but her lawyers say there was no forensic evidence that the shooting took place.

US authorities have linked Siddiqui to al-Qaeda but she was not charged with any terrorism related activities.

Al Jazeera's Kristen Saloomey reports from New York. (04 Feb, 2010)





Convicted




Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Iran’s Islamic Revolution turns 31

It was the late British Prime Minister Harold Wilson who had quipped: “a week is a long time in politics.” That may be true of politics that are fickle by nature; political systems last much longer. In this sense, 31 years cannot be considered too long given that some systems have existed for centuries. So what is special about Iran’s Islamic Revolution that turns 31 this month?

The question can only be properly addressed in the context of how the Islamic Revolution occurred and what it signalled for the prevailing dominant global order. Despite much hype about national independence movements in the early part of the last century that culminated in the emergence of scores of new states on the world map, their independence was fraudulent. The regimes that emerged from the bowels of colonialism were as much a part of the colonial system as they were during direct colonialism imposed from Europe. Only the rulers’ faces changed: from white men lording over brown/dark skinned people to brown/dark skinned men taking over from white masters. For the overwhelming majority of masses in Asia and Africa, it was business as usual.

The present political architecture of the world was cobbled together by the victors of the Second World War. They declared that they have a right to determine how the rest of the world should be governed. It is a continuation of colonialism that had existed for at least 200 years. At the end of the Second World War — it is a misnomer to call it a “world war” since the entire world was not at war, only the Europeans and later joined by the US, were at each other’s throats — the exploitative system was formalised through such instruments as the United Nations and the Security Council, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All these were aliases for the predatory powers led by the US. The world was also divided into spheres of influence between the Soviet Union and the US ensuring no country was allowed to break free from either power’s area of influence. If any dared, the predatory power’s tanks, ships, troops and planes were always ready to bring it back into line.

Iran’s unique achievement is that its movement for freedom was beholden to neither superpower. It was led by a muttaqi ‘alim, Imam Khomeini, whose understanding and learning of the global situation was rooted in the values and teachings of Islam. He did not look or behave like any of the other leaders of so-called independence movements whether Ahmed Soekarno of Indonesia or Jamal Abdul Nasser of Egypt or a host of others. Imam Khomeini also did not lead a “national” movement; he led an Islamic movement that wanted nothing less than the total dismantling of the colonial imposed order in Iran. Had Iran conducted itself like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, for instance, the West would not have unleashed its vicious propaganda and war against the Islamic State. Even before the revolution had succeeded in overthrowing the Western-backed regime of the Shah, malicious propaganda of wilful distortions and lies was being spread.

Immediately after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, a campaign of assassinations of leading figures of the revolution was launched. It was perpetrated through the West’s agents such as the munafiqeen that go by the inappropriate title, the Mujahideen-e Khalq Organization (MKO), and Western-backed opportunists represented by such figures as Abul Hassan Bani Sadr and Sadeq Qutbzadeh, among others. More than 1,200 leading figures of the revolution became victim of their criminal acts. Among those martyred in the early days were such leading figures as Ayatullah Moffateh, Ayatullah Mutahhari, Chief Justice Ayatullah Beheshti, President Muhammad Ali Rajaei and Prime Minister Muhammad Bahonar. Any other state would have collapsed; the Islamic State led by the Imam stood firm because he had unshakable faith in Allah (Â) and enjoyed the support of the masses.

While Iran was still in the throes of the revolution, an external invasion from Iraq was launched. Saddam Husain was only a front for a coalition of international outlaws: the US, Britain, France, Germany and the entire crop of illegitimate Arabian regimes minus Syria. The Iraqi-led war was supposed to cripple Iran and bring it to its knees. Bani Sadr, who was president at the time, wanted to surrender after two weeks. It was the Imam’s courage that dismissed all talk of defeatism. Bani Sadr soon fled the country to save his skin but Iran went on to wage a valiant struggle for eight years in defence of the revolution. And it did it all alone. At the end of the war, it had incurred no debt, unlike Britain that had accumulated $55 billion in debt at the end of the Second World War that had lasted a mere five years. The US today has a debt of $11 trillion because of the two wars it is waging in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Islamic State has also been subjected to sanctions. These have turned out to be a blessing in disguise. Without any outside help, Iranian scientists and engineers have made remarkable progress in the nuclear and other scientific fields defying all Western predictions of its imminent collapse. While Iran’s progress in the technical arena is impressive, it is vulnerable in some sectors. One is culture. The West, especially the US, beams its hedonistic propaganda through satellite channels it funds. The other is the media war against Iran. While Tehran has invested in its own global channels, they are still weak. This can be overcome if Iran works in cooperation with like-minded organizations to get its message across and overcome the vicious propaganda of the West.

It is interesting to note that despite all the attempts at undermining Iran, US policymakers are still not sure how the system works there. This was confirmed by a Rand paper released last month titled Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads: An Exploration of Iranian Leadership Dynamics. While referring to the “serious challenges” the Islamic Republic of Iran poses “to US interests in the Middle East”, the paper goes on to admit: “Yet the US ability to ‘read’ the regime in Tehran and formulate appropriate policies has been handicapped by the lack of access to Iran experienced by US diplomats and other citizens and by what many observers lament as the opacity of Iranian decision-making processes.” The paper was funded by the US Department of Defense and conducted within the Intelligence Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute.

Only an Islamic State shielded from predatory powers can force its enemies to admit their own weaknesses. 


Monday, February 1, 2010

Malaysia: Opposition leader Anwar faces ‘show trial’

Insider (insider_latest) on Twitter
 
 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE - 29 January 2010
Amnesty International has urged the Malaysian authorities to drop politically motivated criminal charges of sodomy against Anwar Ibrahim, the country’s opposition leader, after he today lost an appeal for access to the government’s evidence against him. 

His trial is now set to begin on 2 February at the High Court. This case is the second time in 12 years that the authorities have brought such charges against the former deputy prime minister. 

Following his public criticism of then-Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammed in 1998, Anwar was arrested and convicted on sodomy and corruption charges. He spent six years in solitary confinement before his conviction was overturned and he was released. 

“The Malaysian authorities have resorted to the same old dirty tricks in an attempt to remove the opposition leader from politics,” said Sam Zarifi, Asia-Pacific director at Amnesty International. “Malaysia’s judiciary should throw out these charges.” 

Amnesty International considered a prisoner of conscience before his release in 2004. 

For five years, Anwar was banned from seeking public office as a result of his conviction on corruption charges. After the ban expired in April 2008, he won a parliamentary seat on 26 August 2008, and become opposition leader as head of the People’s Justice Party (Parti Keadilan Rakyat). 

But one month before his election, on 17 July 2008, Anwar was again arrested on charges that he had committed sodomy with a male former aide. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison and loss of political office. 

The criminal charge of sodomy against Anwar, under Section 377B of the Penal Code, is at odds with international human rights standards. This British colonial-era law provides for prison and whipping, a punishment that violates the international law prohibition on torture and other ill-treatment. Moreover, the UN Human Rights Commission in 1997 ruled that sodomy laws infringe the fundamental right to privacy. 

Amnesty International is seriously concerned about fair-trial issues surrounding Anwar’s case. The prosecution’s refusal to deliver evidence to the defence at the pre-trial stage infringes international fair-trial standards and Malaysian law. 

“Anwar’s case has rightly raised doubts among the international community and investors about Malaysia’s commitment to justice and the rule of law,” said Zarifi. 

Under Section 51A of the Malaysia’s Criminal Procedure Code, the prosecution must deliver documents and a written statement of facts favourable to the defence. The UN Human Rights Committee has established that the minimum facilities for fair trials “must include access to documents and other evidence which the accused requires to prepare his case.” 

On 29 January, however, the Malaysian Federal Court failed to uphold the prosecution’s obligation to provide access to evidence which Anwar’s lawyers believe may help exonerate him. In an earlier decision, the Court of Appeals had termed the defence’s application for evidence a “fishing expedition.” 

“The court’s decision to allow the prosecution to withhold key evidence sets a dangerous precedent for criminal cases in Malaysia,” said Zarifi. “This is a recipe for unfair trials.” 


Davos Open Forum 2010 - Does Religion's Claim to Truth Lead to Violence?

30.01.2010 | Religions motivate people to relate to each other, to create understanding and to foster peace. But religions can be abused for political ideologies. Formulated as a universal right to truth, religion can turn into a claim to power, which may lead to violence. Recognizing this, the Ecumenical Council of Churches proclaimed the Decade for Overcoming Violence, which ends in 2010.

Does religion have a tendency to impose its claim to truth through violence? Under what conditions?

How is communal life possible in a society with multiple claims to truth?

Do political views promote a claim to truth, especially when they legitimatize themselves religiously?

This session is co-organized with the Federation of Swiss Protestant Churches (SEK-FEPS).

1. Muhammad Ashafa, Imam, Interfaith Mediation Center (IMC), Nigeria
2. Muhammad Abdul Bari, Secretary-General, Muslim Council of Britain, United Kingdom
3. Edna Brocke, Head of the Old Synagogue Memorial in Essen
4. Marcia Pally, Professor of Multilingual Multicultural Studies, New York University, USA
5. Thomas Wipf, President of the Council, Federation of Swiss Protestant Churches, Switzerland

Moderated by
Urs Leuthard, Moderator, Swiss Television SF DRS, Switzerland






Davos 2010 Wrap Up: Rebuilding The Global Economy On A Principled Foundation


Source: World Economic Forum | Published Monday, 1 February, 2010 - 16:47

# At the 40th World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2010, participants found that the global recovery is fragile, and now is the moment to rethink values as the world rebuilds prosperity

# All countries in the G20 and beyond should find new pathways to sustainable growth and job creation

# Concretely, Bill and Melinda Gates, Co-Chairs of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is a founding partner of the GAVI Alliance, pledged US$ 10 billion to vaccinate over 8 million children in the next decade

# Former US President William J. Clinton announced a joint initiative between the World Economic Forum, the Clinton Global Initiative and the UN to support Haiti’s long-term reconstruction

# Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak, Mexican President Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa and French President Nicolas Sarkozy all set forth agendas for global engagement to prevent future crises and to promote sustainability and principled growth

At the conclusion of the 40th World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, participants pledged to rethink, rebuild and redesign the global economy based on sustainable principles. The sense of the Meeting, echoed by Lawrence H. Summers, Director of the US National Economic Council (NEC), was that the world was experiencing “a statistical recovery and a human recession.” “We are not out of the woods yet,” said Michael Oreskes, Senior Managing Editor of the Associated Press. “The recovery is still very fragile in many developed economies.” Principled leadership is key to stabilization.

“At the end, it’s an interdependent system,” said Josef Ackermann, Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee of Deutsche Bank; Member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum; and Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2010. “If you lose the support of society, you are not going to achieve your corporate objectives.”

Job creation is critical to sustainable recovery. There is a role for all to play in job creation, underscored Patricia A. Woertz, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), and Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2010. “And retaining jobs is as important as creating new ones.” The recession also demonstrated that the world must hear better the voices outside of the G8. “The self-confidence of emerging nations is completely different,” said Azim H. Premji, Chairman of Wipro, and Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2010. He warned that in India and China “if services are put under severe, unreasonable restrictions, you will get tariffs overnight.”

“If you have lost the trust of societies, you cannot just respond technically, you have to respond morally,” said Ackermann. Rowan D. Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, United Kingdom, urged participants to take collective responsibility for the future by being individually responsible now. Living responsibly in the present means living within ecological limits to ensure the security of work and food. "Responsibility for the future means being responsible for a vision of humanity which excites and enlarges us," he added.